Monday, October 30, 2006

Madlibs

Earlier today I was looking around online to find the entry downranges for the various Apollo missions - actual, not design constraints. (By the way, no luck there, so if anyone can point me in the right direction, I'll send you cookies in the mail.)

I did, however, come across the Apollo 15 Flight Journal for the last day of the mission, which appears to be just a transcript of the communication between the astronauts, flight controllers, and various recovery teams. Some sections have better comm than others, though, so in some cases the words were unintelligible and are just left out:
Recovery: Apollo 15, this is Recovery. Roger your [garble] on 243.0.
Scott:
Recovery, 15. We're in good shape.
But it gets worse. Which, of course, means that it gets funnier.
Recovery: We're in contact. We're in contact.
Recovery:
[garble] copying you loud and clear, [garble]. Okay, ARIA 1.
After a while, whoever's doing the transcription just gives up.
Recovery: [Garble.]
Spacecraft:
[Garble.]
Recovery:
[Garble.] Over.
Recovery:
All right. [garble]

1 comment:

Gavin said...

I found this table several years ago, it's a good summary.

http://history.nasa.gov/SP-4029/Apollo_18-40_Entry_Splashdown_and_Recovery.htm

You want the range row. The LEO entries generally flew farther than the lunar return entries because of the shallower flight path angle at entry. Apollo 11 flew the farthest downrange of lunar return because they redesignated the landing site a few hundred miles to avoid a bad weather system. It wasn't far enough to skip; Apollo 11's trajectory lofted a bit but it never left the atmosphere.